The Argumentative Indian’s guide to the Layman’s Universe
The unruly chaos of the Indian political scenario is in stark contrast to the stringent conformation to rules practiced in Western countries such as the US and the UK.
The social scenario though is quite a different story, and the indomitable structure of the Indian society is far vigilant than the disorderly mess seen in the temperate climes of the Western world. The net entropy may seem to have been maintained. But, where from does such irregularity stem, considering the fact that both the systems are highly successful in their own way?
For an individual ignorant of sociological theories, it is a wonderful riddle to be pondered upon while sipping a cup of tea in the evening. There is no doubt that the argumentative Indian will eventually stumble upon a solution, or at least bring it to a rational conclusion.
In India, while the vegetarians wrap the myelin sheaths of their nerves with pure ghee, the fish-eating populations revel in the nutritional benefits of polyunsaturated fatty acids. It is said that the oil of almonds has excellent nerve-strengthening properties, which can be superseded only by a strong argument in favor of fish. But while the general Indian populace decides on which food is better for the brain, the West revels on the riches of red meat.
Red meat, it has to be said, provides indisputable amounts of stamina, especially when required in short bursts, thanks to creatinine which is an energy molecule specifically intended for use by muscles. Red meat is also helpful in replenishing the amino acid needs of the body during intense exercise and injury. But red meat to not useful for the brain, and in fact, has nothing to supplement the nutrition that can be got from eating ghee, almond oil and fish. The brain is in no hurry, and it can live quite well on the slow release of energy through the metabolism of ghee.
But is the diet so important in deciding social and political structure of a race of human beings? Somewhere there seems to be a link. There is no doubt though that while India is a mill of spontaneous creation, the Western countries are more of a workshop of rigorous produce, and when the two cultures meet, even a fifth grader can see the results.
That there are always more ways than one to solve a problem can be seen by the unequivocal success of the two parallel universes built on diametrically opposite principles. Food (or maybe even weather) is a direct evidence of the effect of nurture that the layman can easily identify with. But to carry on with the nature versus nurture debate, one must dig deeper into genetics, and that falls in the vague, undecipherable world of statistically rationalized scientific discoveries. That, to the layman’s dismay only makes a simple story quite complicated.
Dwaipayan Adhya

Comments
Post a Comment